AT
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (A)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 FY2025 delivered $1.681B revenue (+1.4% reported, +1.2% core) and non-GAAP EPS $1.31; instruments book-to-bill was >1, an atypical seasonal positive, driven by strong LC/LC/MS and PFAS workflows .
- Management lowered FY2025 reported revenue guidance to $6.68–$6.76B on FX headwinds (now ~1.9% YoY), while maintaining core growth (+2.5%–3.5%) and non-GAAP EPS $5.54–$5.61; Q2 guidance set at $1.61–$1.65B revenue and $1.25–$1.28 non-GAAP EPS .
- China stimulus was a material Q1 tailwind (~$35M recognized; 50% win-rate); management expects a second round later in FY25 but did not include it in guidance (upside risk) .
- Gross margin compressed to 54.7% and operating margin to 25.1% on mix, currency, and Lunar New Year timing; management reiterated Ignite transformation targets (FY25 +50–70 bps op margin; 3-year +70–100 bps) and reported stronger pricing execution .
- Wall Street consensus via S&P Global was unavailable due to data limits; relative to company guidance, Q1 revenue was just above the top-end and non-GAAP EPS ahead of expectations, a positive sentiment driver near term .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- PFAS workflows accelerated (+70% YoY), contributing ~75 bps to company growth; Europe and CAM demand broadened beyond environmental into food and chemical materials .
- LC/LC/MS momentum from the October Infinity III launch drove high-single-digit growth in pharma, double-digit ex-China; instruments book-to-bill >1, signaling recovery .
- China stimulus execution: ~$35M recognized with ~50% win rate; made-in-China manufacturing and local capability positioned Agilent to capture outsized share .
-
What Went Wrong
- Gross margin compressed 20–30 bps on currency and China stimulus mix; operating margin down vs prior year, reflecting FX and Lunar New Year timing .
- Academia & Government weakened (~-7% YoY globally), with disproportionate softness in China; management widened Q2 guidance range to reflect U.S. federal funding uncertainty .
- FX turned materially adverse: incremental ~$110M FY headwind versus prior guide; FY reported revenue lowered while EPS held via hedging and cost actions .
Financial Results
Segment performance (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024):
Key KPIs and operating drivers:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and transformation: “We have moved from planning to execution on our market-first strategy… seeing the early benefits of our Ignite Transformation to become nimbler and make decisions faster” — Padraig McDonnell, CEO .
- Demand drivers: “Our instrument book-to-bill was greater than 1 in Q1… another sign of market recovery… led by Infinity III and success in China” — Padraig McDonnell .
- PFAS workflows: “PFAS grew 70% in the quarter, contributing 75 basis points of growth… our 6495 Triple Quad LC/MS is the most complete instrument in the PFAS testing market” — Bob McMahon, CFO .
- FX and guidance: “We are now projecting an incremental $110 million in currency headwinds… currency is now expected to represent a 1.9% headwind… full year non-GAAP EPS unchanged at $5.54 to $5.61” — Bob McMahon .
Q&A Highlights
- Guidance prudence: Wider Q2 range (~$40M) and maintained FY core growth reflect NIH funding uncertainty (<~1% exposure) and tariff risk; no material customer impact observed yet .
- FX quantification:
$110M FY headwind ($0.09 EPS), Q2$30–$32M revenue headwind ($0.02–$0.03 EPS) . - China stimulus: ~$35M recognized in Q1; ~50% win rate; second round expected in H2 but not in guide; roughly half of Q1 stimulus likely pull-forward .
- Replacement cycle: Infinity III accelerating LC replacements; typical cycle 9–12 months; installed base older than normal; order growth outpaced revenue .
- Margins: Gross margin pressured by mix (China stimulus) and FX; pricing traction better than expected; Ignite to deliver +50–70 bps in FY25 .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) was unavailable due to data limits. As a proxy, results were above internal expectations: Q1 revenue just above the top-end of guidance and non-GAAP EPS ahead of expectations, suggesting a positive setup versus company outlook .
- Implication: In absence of consensus benchmarks, estimate revisions should reflect stronger PFAS and LC momentum, but offset by FX headwinds and cautious A&G demand .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- PFAS is a structural growth vector with diversified end-market uptake; Agilent’s workflow-led positioning is driving outsized contribution, supporting top-line resilience even amid FX and funding uncertainty .
- Infinity III catalyzes an LC replacement cycle with improving win rates and order growth outpacing revenue; expect steady multi-quarter cadence rather than a single-quarter “super-cycle” .
- China stimulus is an upside lever: ~$35M recognized, strong win-rate, second round likely in H2 but excluded from guide; base China business viewed as stable .
- Margin trajectory should improve through FY25 on pricing, procurement, and Ignite savings (50–70 bps), but near-term gross margin remains sensitive to mix (stimulus) and FX .
- FX is the key macro swing factor: incremental ~$110M headwind lowered FY revenue guide while EPS held via hedging and cost actions; monitor USD trends and hedging efficacy .
- A&G demand is the primary soft spot (~-7%); management widened Q2 range to reflect U.S. federal funding uncertainty; keep watch on February/March spending cadence .
- NASD/BIOVECTRA integration advances the CDMO thesis in peptides/gene editing; FY25 revenue contribution modest with larger mix shift expected into FY26 as qualifications convert .